| Table 1: Data Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Feb 2005 Test
Results with PERMEATOR "OFF" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PV OFF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GASOLINE SAVINGS |
|
|
Pulses |
%HC |
Avg. Temp |
ft3 |
mg of C3 |
lbm |
mass gasoline |
gallons liquid |
gallons liquid/day |
% throughput |
| Open (Station) |
1,773 |
24.78 |
|
884.40 |
|
30.41 |
45.61 |
8.77 |
11.94 |
|
| Closed (Station) |
1,117 |
59.13 |
|
566.68 |
|
36.45 |
54.68 |
10.52 |
9.03 |
|
| Overall |
2,889 |
42.29 |
71.06 |
1,450.58 |
30,318,967.89 |
66.84 |
100.26 |
19.28 |
21.31 |
0.111% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PV ON |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulses |
%HC |
Avg. Temp |
ft3 |
mg of C3 |
lbm |
mass gasoline |
gallons liquid |
gallons liquid/day |
% throughput |
| Open (Station) |
284 |
27.81 |
72.46 |
71.60 |
1,027,415.96 |
2.27 |
3.40 |
0.65 |
6.53 |
|
| Closed (Station) |
454 |
57.00 |
64.81 |
116.27 |
3,423,961.38 |
7.55 |
11.32 |
2.18 |
4.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.08 |
0.059% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage Tank
Evaporative Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1999 CARB
Study, " Total Hydrocarbon Emissions from Two Phase II Vacuum Assist
Vapor Recovery Systems During Baseline Operation and Simulated Refueling of
On-Board Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) Equipped
Vehicles" |
| Project
Number: ST-98-XX, Compliance Division |
|
|
|
|
D |
E |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a, b value explanation: since the p/v ON data
did not yield meaningful data due to gross leaks until after 3:00 pm during
the data collection period (data collection started at 10:00 am), ARID extrapolated the meaningful data time
interval |
|
to calculate the 2.031 lbm/1000 gallon figure
at propane,C3H8. The gross leaks were
not fixed until 3:00. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
B |
C |
|
February-05 |
February-05 |
|
|
|
|
Gilbarco |
|
Dresser Wayne |
Dresser Wayne |
|
ARID Test, Gilbarco |
ARID Test, Gilbarco |
ARID, Evap Loss Model |
|
|
|
(PV ON) |
|
(PV ON) |
(PV OFF) |
|
(PV ON) |
(PV OFF) |
(PV OFF) |
|
|
|
(lbm/1,000 gal) |
|
(lbm/1,000 gal) |
(lbm/1,000 gal) |
|
(lbm/1,000 gal) |
(lbm/1,000 gal) |
(lbm/1,000 gal) |
|
| Baseline |
|
0.396 |
|
0.028 |
0.026 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 44.9% ORVR penetration |
|
0.782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39.5% ORVR penetration |
|
|
|
0.0524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38.2% ORVR penetration |
|
|
|
|
0.289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40% ORVR penetration |
as C3H8 |
a |
Matus |
|
|
|
1.200 |
3.480 |
|
|
|
gasoline vapor |
|
|
|
|
|
3.047 |
5.775 |
6.578 |
|
|
as C3H8 |
b |
ARID |
|
|
|
2.031 |
|
4.385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as C3H8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARID/Gilbarco |
1.53 |
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARID/Gilbarco |
2.60 |
b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARID/Wayne |
22.90 |
PV ON |
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARID/Wayne |
38.77 |
PV ON |
b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARID/Wayne |
12.04 |
PV OFF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.53 = 1.200 / 0.782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.60 = 2.031 / 0.782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.90 = 1.200 / 0.0524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.77 = 2.031 / 0.0524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.04 = 3.480 / 0.289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PERMEATOR
"ON" Summary |
|
Retentate (Clean Air Exhaust) |
|
Feed |
|
Recovery Efficiency |
|
|
|
|
|
Total flow scf |
235.54 |
|
981.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mass grams |
122.69 |
|
16,710.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mass lbm |
0.27 |
|
36.84 |
|
99.27% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|